Ask ten different scholars of rhetoric to define the word, and youโll get ten
different answers. Dictionary definitions usually say something along the lines
of โthe skill or study of using language as persuasionโ (the one I give to my
students gets even more specific: The art and skill of using language to
communicate and/or persuadeโ). I suppose the key words in these definitions are
โlanguageโ and โpersuadeโ. Analyze any piece of writingโbe it fiction or
non-fiction, a bumper sticker or a political speech, a text message or a tweet,
a lab report or a love letterโand youโll find that each one is designed to move
the reader in some way: to thought, to action, to response. The language may
make an emotional appeal, a logical appeal, or an ethical appeal. Whatโs more,
each one of these aforementioned texts tends to be in response to something else
and is part of an ongoing conversation.
Moreover, when we write, be it a novel or a blog post or a marketing analysis or
a resume, we write with purpose and an audience in mindโeven if we keep a
private diary, we write โDear Diary,โ implying an intended reader, even if that
reader is the self. (Donโt even get me started on the rhetorical situations of
Facebook status updatesโฆ)
When I wrote the first draft of my novel
FAKING IT, I was fresh out
of graduate school and was still in a major love-geekout-fest with rhetorical
theory and writing. Iโd not written much fiction throughout my lifetime (my last
attempts being in high school and being quite terribleโI recall a lot of scenes
set at beach parties, for some reason) and wasnโt very confident that this most
recent attempt was going to pan out. And yet, there was something different this
timeโthis idea I had, about a thirty-something, sexually inhibited woman who
befriends a male escort, was screaming to be born.
I hadnโt set out to make Andi a writing and rhetoric professor. Itโs just that
she needed to teach Devin something while he was giving her those love lessons.
And since I have always recommended my students to write what they know, I
thought,
Why not have Andi teach Devin about writing? After all, thatโs what
I
knowโฆ
It turned out to be what I fondly call โthe happy little accident.โ
Andi and Devinโs relationship is wonderfully rhetorical. Itโs an ongoing
dialectic, each one constantly challenging the other to act (or react) through
language and dialogue. Their tutorials, discussions, arguments, and intimacies
are all persuasive in what they say (and donโt say) to one another. They
discover each other (and themselves) through writing, whether itโs Devinโs
journal entries or Andiโs reading selections. Even the art exhibits Devin and
Andi view are rhetorical in that the characters witness a reflection of
themselves and the world around them, and in turn become a part of something
else.
Whatโs more, this rhetorical relationship is precisely what makes Devin and Andi
so mutually attractive. Itโs their โspark,โ if you will. Not the stuff most
romances are made of, but as and Devin and Andiโs dialogue poured onto the page,
I was pleasantly surprised by how well it worked.
I canโt help but take a rhetorical approach to my writingโitโs sort of in my
DNAโbut itโll come as no surprise to you that dialogue is perhaps my favorite
part of novel-writing. Itโs when the characters reveal themselves, all in what
they say and how they say it. The truth comes out, even when theyโre lying to
each other or themselves.
Relationships are wonderfully rhetorical; all you have to do is sit back and
listen to the conversation.
Elisa Lorello
http://elisalorello.com/
5 comments posted.
I have to say that I found your blog a lot deeper than most, as well as very interesting. Your book has quite a different slant from the others out there, and I'm willing to give it a shot. Perhaps we should look at life from your perspective, at least for a while. It might make us a little more open-minded to the things around us, as well as the people we are involved with. Thank you for another way of looking at life.
(Peggy Roberson 12:15pm February 21, 2011)
I agree with Peggy in that your blog is deeper than most. It also left me feeling a bit inadequate, but maybe I'm just not used to that level of rhetoric.
(Karen Cherubino 2:55pm February 21, 2011)
@Peggy, @Karen, @Lisa: Thank you so much for your comments -- I'm so pleased you liked the blogpost, and thanks for giving the book a shot!
@Lisa: The re-release of Faking It is next month, so hopefully your "wish" will come true! :)
@Karen: No need for inadequacies! I'm just a writing and rhetoric geek, is all. :P
(Elisa Lorello 8:32pm February 21, 2011)
Thanks for making me hit the dictionary twice; once for rhetoric and the other for dictionery which, of course, I changed to the right spelling. Your love of words is certainly apparent. I love the eloquence of flowery speech and long words do not bother me except to want to have a dictionary nearby.
(Alyson Widen 11:02pm February 27, 2011)