April 28th, 2025
Home | Log in!

On Top Shelf
UNMASK ME MY LOVEUNMASK ME MY LOVE
Fresh Pick
MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS
MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS

New Books This Week

Reader Games


March Into Romance: New Releases to Fall in Love With!

Slideshow image


Since your web browser does not support JavaScript, here is a non-JavaScript version of the image slideshow:

slideshow image
"A KNOCKOUT STORY!"
From New York Times
Bestselling Cleo Coyle


slideshow image
To keep his legacy, he must keep his wife. But she's about to change the game.


slideshow image
A haunting past. A heartbreaking secret. A love that still echoes across time.


slideshow image
A city slicker. A country cowboy. A love they didn�t plan for.


slideshow image
The mission is clear. The attraction? Completely out of control.


slideshow image
A string of fires. A growing attraction. And a danger neither of them saw coming.


A Matter of Interpretation by Antonin Scalia

Purchase

Add to Wish List


Also by Antonin Scalia:

Reading Law, June 2012
Hardcover / e-Book
Making Your Case, May 2008
Hardcover
A Matter of Interpretation, July 1997
Trade Size (reprint)

A Matter of Interpretation
Antonin Scalia

This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints.

Princeton University Press
July 1997
176 pages
ISBN: 0691004005
Trade Size (reprint)
Add to Wish List

Non-Fiction

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim--"distinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo!) he reaches the goal--good law." But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.

In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial lawmaking that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an everchanging Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the "strict constructionism" that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly "smuggle" in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals.

No awards found for this book.

Comments

No comments posted.

Registered users may leave comments.
Log in or register now!

© 2003-2025 off-the-edge.net  all rights reserved Privacy Policy