September 24th, 2026
Home | Log in!
❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤
Welcome to FreshFiction

Are you a reader
or an author?

Help us personalize your experience. Choose your role below.
You can always change this later using the switcher button.

or

You can switch anytime using the floating button.

Limited Time Fresh Fiction Access

Exclusive Marketing Opportunities for Authors

Curious about how Fresh Access helps authors gain more visibility and connect with active readers?

Discover premium promotional opportunities, enhanced exposure, and author-focused services designed to help your books stand out.

Read More →
Fresh Pick
MEET CUTE MAGIC
📚 New Books This Week 📰 Latest News 🎪 Reader Games

Snowbound secrets, shifter wars, family lies, and epic battles β€” September delivers it all.

Slideshow image


slideshow image
Some promises cost you the one you love.

Test section:

slideshow image
The Temple of Kronos wants her dead. The Stoneslayer wants her destroyed. Neither will have her.

Test section:

slideshow image
A poisoned cousin, a five-year-old's life, and a family with too many secrets.

Test section:

slideshow image
Betrayal runs in her blood. Justice runs in his. Together, they burn it all down.

Test section:

slideshow image
"ANOTHER WINNER!"
From New York Times
Bestselling Cleo Coyle

Test section:

slideshow image
Running from her past, she finds a killer, a protector, and her faith.

LINCOLN'S TRAGIC PRAGMATISM
By: John Burt

Lincoln, Douglas, and Moral Conflict

Harvard University Press
January 2013
On Sale: January 7, 2013
814 pages
ISBN: 0674050185
EAN: 9780674050181
Hardcover
Add to Wish List

Non-Fiction

In 1858, challenger Abraham Lincoln debated incumbent Stephen Douglas seven times in the race for a U.S. Senate seat from Illinois. More was at stake than slavery in those debates. In Lincoln’s Tragic Pragmatism, John Burt contends that the very legitimacy of democratic governance was on the line. In a United States stubbornly divided over ethical issues, the overarching question posed by the Lincoln-Douglas debates has not lost its urgency: Can a liberal political system be used to mediate moral disputes? And if it cannot, is violence inevitable?

As they campaigned against each other, both Lincoln and Douglas struggled with how to behave when an ethical conflict as profound as the one over slavery strained the commitment upon which democracy dependsβ€”namely, to rule by both consent and principle. This commitment is not easily met, because what conscience demands and what it is able to persuade others to consent to are not always the same. While Lincoln ultimately avoided a politics of morality detached from consent, and Douglas avoided a politics of expediency devoid of morality, neither found a way for liberalism to mediate the conflict of slavery.

That some disputes seemed to lie beyond the horizon of deal-making and persuasion and could be settled only by violence revealed democracy’s limitations. Burt argues that the unresolvable ironies at the center of liberal politics led Lincoln to discover liberalism’s tragic dimensionβ€”and ultimately led to war. Burt’s conclusions demand reevaluations of Lincoln and Douglas, the Civil War, and democracy itself.

Media Buzz

On Point - February 21, 2013

© 2003-2026 off-the-edge.net  all rights reserved Privacy Policy