Home | Log in! or Register February 9th, 2010

Fresh Fiction
Valentine Contests
Todays_Pick

Blog
Latest Buzz
Media Spotlight
Newsletters
Follow us on Twitter
Fan us on Facebook

Bookmark and Share

Slideshow image


Since your web browser does not support JavaScript, here is a non-JavaScript version of the image slideshow:

slideshow image
Dangerous times call for sexy maneuvers


slideshow image
Her charms pack a punch!


slideshow image
A mystery that keeps you laughing until the end!


slideshow image
A strong wolf, a beautiful woman…destiny awaits


slideshow image
Seduction takes a delightful, daring twist



Love, charms and adventures in best February books...

eHarlequin's 12 Deals Of Christmas. Starts Dec 1!

New Blogs, Updates and Not-to-Miss Activity in the "blogosphere"

Blogging Soon:

Fresh Fiction Give-a-ways!
Jennifer Stanley
Blaize Clement
Deanna Raybourn
Sara Lindsey
Elisa Lorello
Dakota Cassidy
Nikki Logan
Laura Bradford
Vicki Lewis Thompson
Carly Phillips

Authors To Watch

Fresh Fiction on Facebook

 


Barnes and NobleBarnes and Noble
Borders.com

Media Buzz

Morning Edition - October 3, 2005

Advice And Consent: The Politics of Appointing Federal Judge
Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A. Segal

With key appointments looming on the horizon, Advice and Consent provides everything concerned citizens need to know to understand the partisan rows that surround the judicial nominating process.

Oxford University Press
October 2005
180 pages
ISBN: 0195300211
Hardcover
$23.00

Non-Fiction

From Louis Brandeis to Robert Bork to Clarence Thomas, the nomination of federal judges has generated intense political conflict. With the coming retirement of one or more Supreme Court Justices--and threats to filibuster lower court judges--the selection process is likely to be, once again, the center of red-hot partisan debate.

In Advice and Consent, two leading legal scholars, Lee Epstein and Jeffrey A. Segal, offer a brief, illuminating Baedeker to this highly important procedure, discussing everything from constitutional background, to crucial differences in the nomination of judges and justices, to the role of the Judiciary Committee in vetting nominees. Epstein and Segal shed light on the role played by the media, by the American Bar Association, and by special interest groups (whose efforts helped defeat Judge Bork).

Though it is often assumed that political clashes over nominees are a new phenomenon, the authors argue that the appointment of justices and judges has always been a highly contentious process--one largely driven by ideological and partisan concerns. The reader discovers how presidents and the senate have tried to remake the bench, ranging from FDR's controversial "court packing" scheme to the Senate's creation in 1978 of 35 new appellate and 117 district court judgeships, allowing the Democrats to shape the judiciary for years.

The authors conclude with possible "reforms," from the so- called nuclear option, whereby a majority of the Senate could vote to prohibit filibusters, to the even more dramatic suggestion that Congress eliminate a judge's life tenure either by term limits or compulsory retirement.

With key appointments looming on the horizon, Advice and Consent provides everything concerned citizens need to know to understand the partisan rows that surround the judicial nominating process.

Comments

No comments posted.

Registered users may leave comments.
Log in or register now!

eharlequin sales

Fresh Fiction contests

 

 

© 2003-2010 off-the-edge.net
all rights reserved
Privacy Policy

Book Reviews Blog Directory Blog Widget by LinkWithin